Science, objectivity, and political responsibility in the litigation of two oil spills

Science, objectivity, and political responsibility in the litigation of two oil spills

This presentation examines the role of scientific experts and expertise in legal proceedings. It compares the decisions made by two scientists contributing to litigation concerning the Exxon Valdez oil spill in Alaska in 1989 and petroleum contamination in the Ecuadorian Amazon by ChevronTexaco from the mid-1960s through the early 1990s.

In the first example, a prominent environmental sociologist was asked to conduct research intended to reduce the punitive damages award against the oil company. In the second case, a geochemist with expertise on groundwater pollution was implicated in federal racketeering and corruption charges filed against the lawyer representing the plaintiffs in the case.

The presentation draws on court transcripts and ‘life writing’ associated with the two contrasting examples to ask questions about science, objectivity, and political responsibility.

About the Speaker

Stuart Kirsch, Professor of Anthropology, University of Michigan

THIS EVENT IS SPONSORED BY THE ANU CLIMATE CHANGE INSTITUTE, THE PACIFIC INSTITUTE, ANTHROPOLOGY PROGRAM, AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL CENTRE FOR LATIN AMERICAN STUDIES.

Date & time

2–4pm 18 September 2018

Location

Weston Theatre, JG Crawford Building

Contacts

 Assoc Prof Matt Tomlinson

Updated:  20 September 2018/Responsible Officer:  Director/Page Contact:  Web Admin